1. Jones LR. Academic Integrity and Academic Dishonesty: A Handbook about Cheating and Plagiarism. Revised and Expanded edition of Florida institute of technology. 2001
2. Sharma S. How to become a competent medical writer? Perspect Clin Res. 2010;1:33–7.[PMC free article][PubMed]
3. Das N, Panjabi M. Plagiarism: Why is it such a big issue for medical writers? Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2:67–71.[PMC free article][PubMed]
4. Ponniah I. Plagiarism and scientific writing: A personal commentary. J Investig Clin Dent. 2012;3:304–6.[PubMed]
5. Jagadesh Kumar M. Being wary of plagiarism. IETE Tech Rev. 2008;25:231–233.
6. Hendee WR. A concern about plagiarism. J Med Phys. 2007;32:143–4.[PMC free article][PubMed]
7. Sapatnekar SM. Plagiarism. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004;52:527–30.[PubMed]
8. Gerding AB. Ethical dilemmas in publishing. A rising tide of plagiarism? J Prosthodont. 2012;21:431–2.[PubMed]
9. Satyanarayana K. Plagiarism: A scourge afflicting the Indian science. Indian J Med Res. 2010;131:373–6.[PubMed]
10. Singh AJ. Plagiarising plagiarism. Indian J Community Med. 2007;32:5–6.
11. Rode Sde M. Plagiarism in scientific publication. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25:101.[PubMed]
12. Shashok K. Authors, editors, and the signs, symptoms and causes of plagiarism. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011;5:303–7.[PMC free article][PubMed]
13. Gupta A. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: A concern. Perspect Clin Res. 2013;4:144–7.[PMC free article][PubMed]
14. Committee on Public Ethics. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practice. J Postgrad Med. 2000;46:217–21.[PubMed]
15. Nichani AS. Re-lie-ability……student/teacher of the year??? J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012;16:483–4.[PMC free article][PubMed]
16. Laishram RS, Singh NS. Plagiarism: A concern for editors. J Med Soc. 2013;27:1–2.
17. Subba Reddy VV. Greetings from Davangere, Karnataka, India: Searching versus researching. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;29:1.[PubMed]
18. Smith AJ. Research integrity and scientific misconduct. J Dent Res. 2008;87:197.[PubMed]
19. Weeks AD. Detecting plagiarism: Google could be the way forward. BMJ. 2006;333:706.[PMC free article][PubMed]
20. Keyvanara M, Ojaghi R, Sohrabi MC, Papi A. Experiences of experts about the instances of plagiarism. J Educ Health Promot. 2013;2:32.[PMC free article][PubMed]
21. Teplitsky PE. Perceptions of Canadian dental faculty and students about appropriate penalties for academic dishonesty. J Dent Educ. 2002;66:485–506.[PubMed]
22. [Last accessed on 27th October 2013]. Available from: http://www.indiana.edu/~wts/pamphlets.shtml .
23. BBC News. Media doctor admits to plagiarism. [Last updated on 2008 Jun 16; Last accessed on 2013 Nov 05]. Available from: http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7452877.stm .
24. Sharma BB, Singh V. Ethics in writing: Learning to stay away from plagiarism and scientific misconduct. Lung India. 2011;28:148–50.[PMC free article][PubMed]
25. Ali J. Plagiarism: An editor's concern. Int J Pharm Investig. 2011;1:129–30.[PMC free article][PubMed]
26. Schulze R. The ethics of scientific publishing. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:355.[PMC free article][PubMed]
27. Ramaswamy M. It is not just the work-It is also the words. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2007;11:169–172.
28. Garner HR. Combating unethical publications with plagiarism detection services. Urol Oncol. 2011;29:95–9.[PMC free article][PubMed]
29. Bazdaric K. Plagiarism detection - Quality management tool for all scientific journals. Croat Med J. 2012;53:1–3.[PMC free article][PubMed]
30. Vasconcelos SM. Writing up research in English: Choice or necessity? Rev Col Bras Cir. 2007;34:1–2.
31. Carver JD, Dellva B, Emmanuel PJ, Parchure R. Ethical considerations in scientific writing. Indian J Sex Transm Dis. 2011;32:124–8.[PMC free article][PubMed]
32. Handa S. Plagiarism and publication ethics: Dos and don’ts. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008;74:301–3.[PubMed]
33. Steen RG. Writing for publication in a medical journal. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16:899–903.[PMC free article][PubMed]
34. Cehreli M, Cehreli Z, Stamm T, Meyer U, Wiesmann HP. Trick or treat? Head Face Med. 2007;3:22.[PMC free article][PubMed]
35. Wager E. How should editors respond to plagiarism? COPE Discussion Paper. [Last accessed on 2013 Oct 27]. Available from: http://www.publicationethics.org/files/Discussion%20document.pdf .
In a research paper, you have to come up with your own original ideas while at the same time making reference to work that's already been done by others. But how can you tell where their ideas end and your own begin? What's the proper way to integrate sources in your paper? If you change some of what an author said, do you still have to cite that author?
Confusion about the answers to these questions often leads to plagiarism. If you have similar questions or are concerned about preventing plagiarism, we recommend using the checklist below.
Planning Your Paper
Consult with Your Instructor
Have questions about plagiarism? If you can't find the answers on our site or are unsure about something, you should ask your instructor. He or she will most likely be very happy to answer your questions. You can also check out the guidelines for citing sources properly. If you follow them and the rest of the advice on this page, you should have no problems with plagiarism.
Plan Your Paper
Planning your paper well is the first and most important step you can take toward preventing plagiarism. If you know you are going to use other sources of information, you need to plan how you are going to include them in your paper. This means working out a balance between the ideas you have taken from other sources and your own, original ideas. Writing an outline or coming up with a thesis statement in which you clearly formulate an argument about the information you find will help establish the boundaries between your ideas and those of your sources.
Take Effective Notes
One of the best ways to prepare for a research paper is by taking thorough notes from all of your sources so that you have much of the information organized before you begin writing. On the other hand, poor note-taking can lead to many problems-- including improper citations and misquotations, both of which are forms of plagiarism! To avoid confusion about your sources, try using different colored fonts, pens, or pencils for each one, and make sure you clearly distinguish your own ideas from those you found elsewhere. Also, get in the habit of marking page numbers, and make sure that you record bibliographic information or web addresses for every source right away-- finding them again later when you are trying to finish your paper can be a nightmare!
Writing Your Paper
When in Doubt, Cite Sources
Of course you want to get credit for your own ideas. And, you don't want your instructor to think that you got all of your information from somewhere else. But if it is unclear whether an idea in your paper really came from you, or whether you got it from somewhere else and just changed it a little, you should always cite your source. Instead of weakening your paper and making it seem like you have fewer original ideas, this will actually strengthen your paper by:
- showing that you are not just copying other ideas but are processing and adding to them,
- lending outside support to the ideas that are completely yours, and
- highlighting the originality of your ideas by making clear distinctions between them and ideas you have gotten elsewhere
Also see: how to cite sources properly
Make it Clear Who Said What
Even if you cite sources, ambiguity in your phrasing can often disguise the real source of any given idea, causing inadvertent plagiarism. Make sure when you mix your own ideas with those of your sources that you always clearly distinguish them. If you are discussing the ideas of more than one person, watch out for confusing pronouns. For example, imagine you are talking about Harold Bloom's discussion of James Joyce's opinion of Shakespeare, and you write: "He brilliantly portrayed the situation of a writer in society at that time." Who is the "He" in this sentence? Bloom, Joyce, or Shakespeare? Who is the "writer": Joyce, Shakespeare, or one of their characters? Always make sure to distinguish who said what, and give credit to the right person.
Know How to Paraphrase
A paraphrase is a restatement in your own words of someone else's ideas. Changing a few words of the original sentences does NOT make your writing a legitimate paraphrase. You must change both the words and the sentence structure of the original, without changing the content. Also, you should keep in mind that paraphrased passages still require citation because the ideas came from another source, even though you are putting them in your own words.
The purpose of paraphrasing is not to make it seem like you are drawing less directly from other sources or to reduce the number of quotations in your paper. It is a common misconception among students that you need to hide the fact that you rely on other sources. Actually it is advantageous to highlight the fact that other sources support your own ideas. Using quality sources to support your ideas makes them seem stronger and more valid. Good paraphrasing makes the ideas of the original source fit smoothly into your paper, emphasizing the most relevant points and leaving out unrelated information.
Learn how to paraphrase properly.
Analyze and Evaluate Your Sources
Not all sources on the web are worth citing-- in fact, many of them are just plain wrong. So how do you tell the good ones apart? For starters, make sure you know the author(s) of the page, where they got their information, and when they wrote it (getting this information is also an important step in avoiding plagiarism!). Then you should determine how credible you feel the source is: how well they support their ideas, the quality of the writing, the accuracy of the information provided, etc. We recommend using the "Web Page Evaluation Criteria" available through New Mexico State University's website.